Chuck & Rick Roberts
We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented .
Eli Wiese
Breach of Duty
Exposing Systematic Deceit, Collusion, and Perjury in Child Abuse Cover - Up by Legal Professionals
Rick Roberts
Exposing Musielak's
Criminal Acts
Through Court Motions
Date
Motions
December 11, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 8, 2024
My Emails to Chuck Roberts
Date
December 1, 2023
March 22, 2024
April 1, 2024
April 4, 2024
April 4, 2024
April 8 , 2024
April 8, 2024
April 8, 2024
April 25, 2024
April 30, 2024
April 30, 2024
Unveiling the Truth: The Questionable Practices of Rick Roberts
In the labyrinth of legal disputes, where the principles of justice should prevail, it is unsettling to
witness the emergence Of dubious characters who operate in the murky shadows Of legal ethics.
Mr. Rick Roberts, the progeny of ML Chuck Roberts – a name already tarnished with allegations
of legal misconduct. The apple, it seems, does not fall far from the tree, and it is with a firm
resolve that we must scrutinize the actions of Mr. Rick Roberts, whose conduct warrants public
attention and deep concern.
A Legacy Marred by Legal Controversy:
As the son ofa figure embroiled in ethical misdemeanors, Rick Roberts has stepped into a
professional sphere that casts a long shadow over his integrity and practices. With a pedigree
interwoven with allegations of legal malpractice, it is imperative that we closely examine the
influence and legacy that guides Mr. Roberts’ actions within our justice system.
Seeking Accountability in the Wake of Questionable Conduct:
Rick Roberts has been implicated in actions that beg for transparency and accountability. When a
legal professional’s behavior calls into question the fairness and impartiality of our courts, we
have a duty to stand up, speak out, and demand investigations into practices that could
potentially corrode the legal profession and the administration of justice itself.
The pursuit of legal recourse is not a game of influence and inheritance; it is a sacred process
aimed at equitable outcomes based on truth and fairness. If Rick Roberts’ conduct echoes the
alleged missteps of his predecessor, then it is not only a personal concern for those directly
affected but a systemic issue that could shake the confidence of the public in legal advocacy and
representation.
A Call to Action for Justice and Integrity:
This is not merely an indictment of an individual lawyer; this is a rallying cry for the protection
of the very fabric of our legal system. Every case that Mr. Rick Roberts touches brings with it the
weight of his family legacy and the lingering questions of his adherence to ethical law practice.
Every client, every courtroom, and every decision are reflections of the values we champion and
the justice we seek to uphold.
In speaking out against Mr. Rick Roberts, we do not aim to target one man but to uphold a
standard. We invite you, the guardians of justice and the protectors of integrity, to join us in this
critical examination. Support our quest to illuminate the truth, endorse our demand for the
highest standards of professional conduct, and contribute your voice to the cause of ensuring that
every element within the legal process operates with unimpeachable honor.
The integrity of our justice system depends upon the accountability of its practitioners. Together,
we can demand that accountability, inspire reform where necessary, and stand vigilant against
any erosion of trust in our legal institutions. It is time to bring to light the full extent of Mr. Rick
Roberts’ professional conduct and to ensure that justice is indeed blind, not to the truths Of
character and conduct, but to the pressures of legacy and connection.
Chuck Roberts
Rallying Against Eegal Injustice: The Stark Case Against Attorney Chuck Roberts
In an ideal justice system, the foundational pillars of justice, impartiality, and fairness are robust
and unwavering. Attorneys, as sworn guardians Of the law, bear a profound responsibility to
uphold these tenets through ethical integrity and a staunch adherence to the rule of law.
However, when the individuals entrusted with our representation and protection egregiously
betray these core principles, it shakes the very bedrock of justice. This is the grave situation I
face in my divorce proceedings, where Mr. Chuck Roberts, representing my spouse, has not only
failed to uphold these ethical standards but has flagrantly violated them, compromising both my
rights and the integrity of the legal system at large.
The actions of Mr. Roberts are not merely failures; they are deliberate and malicious breaches of
legal duty, demonstrating a flagrant disregard for the principles he is supposed to protect. His
unethical practices not only have severe personal repercussions for my family and me but also
pose a significant threat to the credibility and reliability of our legal institutions.
Exposing Deep-Rooted Unethical Practices:
Financial Misrepresentation:
Mr. Roberts has manipula
ted financial documents submitted to
the court, obscuring the true financial obligations of Mr. Thomas Neal, thereby skewing the child
support outcomes to my detriment.
Alarming Collusion and Conspiracy:
Evidence points to a calculated conspiracy involving
Mr.
Roberts, my former attorney Mr. Bill Cherny, Rick Roberts, and Wendy Musielak. This alliance
has led to a series of detrimental legal defeats and an unjust stripping of my parental rights.
Neglect and Mishandling of Abuse Allegations:
These individual
s collectively have dismissed
and hidden grave child abuse allegations reported by my children. Such egregious mishandling
represents a severe breach of professional and ethical duty.
Judicial Collusion and Intimidation:
The collaboration with Judge Louis
Aranda has led to
unlawful legal rulings, including the unwarranted termination of my parental rights and the
sealing of court records to cover up this misconduct. These acts not only strip me of my rights
but also block public scrutiny of their actions.
Acts of Discrimination and Bias:
Restricting Rights Based on Heritage:
Mr. Roberts has pushed for unwarranted restrictions on
a U.S. passport based on Mexican heritage, an act of discrimination that violates constitutional
rights under the 14th Amendment.
Compromise of Guardian Ad Litem:
The apparent complicity between Mr. Roberts and Ms.
Wendy Musielak, the guardian ad litem, damages the impartiality required to truly advocate for
the welfare of children in the justice system.
Crafting False Narratives:
Man ufacturing Mental Illness:
A malicious narrative fabricated by Mr. Roberts, painting me as
mentally unstable, has been bolstered by biased testimonies from associated mental health
providers, resulting in the baseless termination of my parental rights.
Withholding Crucial Records:
Key records from All Saints Catholic Academy, essential for
revealing the truth, have been unjustly withheld, despite legal demands for their release.
Obstructing Justice:
In response to subpoenas aimed at investigating potential
misconduct
linked to my divorce, Mr. Roberts has filed motions to obstruct these legal inquiries, indicating a
clear intent to hinder justice.
On this platform, I not only expose the grave misconduct that has beleaguered my case but also
issue a call to action for all who value the sanctity of justice and the ethical obligations of the
legal profession. We are rallying for transparency, accountability, and a reestablishment of trust
in a system that should act as the moral compass Of our society, not a contributor to its decay.
We urge a thorough investigation into Mr. Chuck Roberts and all associated parties. This
movement transcends my personal quest for justice; it is a demand for the protection of our legal
institutions and the rights of every individual. I seek your support, your voice, and your
commitment as we strive not only for my personal redress but to ensure our legal system remains
a true bastion of fairness and integrity for everyone.