Wendy Musielak

In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.

Martin Luther King Jr

Unmasking Corruption

The Unethical Misconduct of Guardian ad Litem Wendy Musielak and the Devastating
Impact on My Children


When Protectors Become Perpetrators


In a system meant to protect our children, a guardian ad litem is expected to stand as a pillar of safety, ensuring that the innocent are shielded from harm. But my journey through this system has exposed a devastating failure — one where the very person entrusted to protect my children has played a central role in concealing horrific acts of child abuse.

This guardian, despite being flooded with multiple reports of mistreatment, did not just turn away — she actively campaigned for Thomas Neal to be granted full custody. This wasn’t a mistake or an oversight; it was a deliberate action that ignored clear signs of abuse, placing my children in the hands of their abuser.

Her actions went far beyond mere neglect. She sabotaged investigations, spending hours at Thomas Neal’s home, preparing my children for their interviews with investigators, shaping their words to fit a false narrative. She didn’t guide them to tell the truth — she manipulated them, ensuring their voices would be silenced, their pain unseen.

Even more disturbing, she obstructed investigations by DCFS into three separate reports of abuse. She insisted the allegations were “unfounded,” despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Her interference reached a new level when, upon learning of yet another investigation in December 2023, she ordered it to be shut down, praising Thomas Neal as a model father while my children continued to suffer.

But the worst betrayal came on December 22, 2023, when she collaborated with Thomas Neal’s legal team in a calculated effort to strip away my parental rights. This wasn’t just an attack on me — it was an attempt to silence my children, to erase their truth, and to protect an abuser. My son, who bravely told authorities that he had been physically assaulted, was ripped away from me, causing him further trauma and devastation.

This is not just my story. This is an indictment of a broken system that allows those meant to protect our children to instead become perpetrators of injustice. When a guardian ad litem, who should stand for truth and safety, colludes with abusers and silences victims, we must take a stand. The system that failed my children could fail any child.

We need immediate and systemic reform to ensure that no guardian can ever again abuse their power to hide the truth, shield the guilty, and destroy innocent lives. The stakes are too high — this is about the safety and future of our children.

I urge you to demand accountability. To demand transparency. To demand justice. Every day we stay silent is another day the system fails another child. My family has been targeted — our computers hacked, files deleted, emails blocked. She has gone as far as hiring a woman, Bridget, to pose as a fellow victim, only to steer me towards hiring an attorney who sabotaged my case. She’s even requested a therapist for my children who has a warrant for her arrest. She is relentless in her attempts to undermine justice.

This has to end. We cannot wait any longer. This woman and others like her must be stopped before more lives are ruined.

Justice delayed is justice denied. But together, we can make sure it’s not denied any longer. For my children. For your children. For all children. Please help me!

Revealing the Truth

My Emails to Wendy Musielak

Date

Email

Exposing the Betrayal of Trust and Justice by Guardian ad Litem Wendy Musielak

On November 10th, 2022, Wendy Musielak was appointed by Judge Louis Aranda to act as the guardian ad
Type equation here.litem for my three mmor children. However, my first encounter with her on December 6th,
2022, unfolded a month after her appointment and left me deeply unsettled. Her cavalier response to my
concerns regarding Thomas Neal’s abusive behavior, belittling statements, and apparent disinterest in protecting
my children’s welfare raised serious red flags.

The tenure of Ms. Musielak as guardian ad litem has been marred by gross negligence, egregious bias, and
violations of legal and ethical standards, flagrantly betraying the trust placed in her to safeguard and advocate
for my children’s best interests. Instead Of fulfilling her court-ordered duty, Ms. Musielak has showcased an
alarming allegiance with my husband and his legal team, prompting grave doubts about her impartiality and
efficacy.

Despite being obliged to conduct a fair investigation, Ms. Musielak has displayed an unmistakable preference for extensive meetings with the opposing party, neglecting to engage with my attorney or consider my perspective. This one-sided communication casts doubt on the integrity of her role and undermines the prospect of an unbiased Investigation.

Perhaps most concernmg is Ms. Musielak’s consistent failure to furnish comprehensive reports to the court,
withholding essential findings and recommendations. This critical omission has unduly influenced judicial
decisions crucial to my children’s welfare, potentially placing them in harm’s way.

Subsequent revelations have underscored Ms. Musielak’s biased questioning techniques favoring Thomas Neal
and her deliberate disclosure of vital communications with agencies such as DCFS and the prosecutor’s office.

Alarming subpoena records reveal that Ms. Musielak misrepresented facts to investigators, falsely denying the
existence of abuse and baselessly attributing it to my alleged mental illness. This egregious distortion aimed to
unfairly discredit the legitimate concerns raised by my children.

The consequences Of Ms. Musielak’s actions have been nothing short Of devastating. I have lost custody and regular contact with my children, resulting in profound emotional and psychological distress. The forced separation has inflicted considerable mental harm on my children, who have been forcibly separated from their primary caregiver.
The repercussions of this grievous betrayal have had devastating consequences for the innocent lives caught in the crossfire. My children, robbed ofthe sanctuary they deserved, have been subjected to untold emotional, physical, and psychological harm as a direct result of Ms. Musielak’s reprehensible actions.
The time for accountability has come. Ms. Mus .k’s reprehensible misconduct cannot go unpunished. Her blatant disregard for the safety and well-being ot my children, coupled with her shocking alliance with an abuser, has threatened the very fabric of justice we hold dear. This cannot stand.
We must demand a thorough investigation Into her actions, with the aim of not only bringing her to account for her transgressions but also preventing the recurrence of such blatant negligence and betrayal. The voiceless victims of her appalling misconduct deserve justice, and it is our responsibility to ensure it is finally and decisively served.
The time has come to unmask Wendy Musielak, to reveal the depths of her treachery, and to restore faith in a justice system that has been tainted by her unethical and immoral actions. Only then can we begin to heal the wounds inflicted upon my children by her personal alliances over the pursuit of truth and justice.
On November 10th, 2022, Wendy Musielak was appointed by Judge Louis Aranda to act as the guardian ad Type equation here.litem for my three mmor children. However, my first encounter with her on December 6th, 2022, unfolded a month after her appointment and left me deeply unsettled. Her cavalier response to my concerns regarding Thomas Neal’s abusive behavior, belittling statements, and apparent disinterest in protecting my children’s welfare raised serious red flags.
The time has come to unmask Wendy Musielak, to reveal the depths of her treachery, and to restore faith in a justice system that has been tainted by her unethical and immoral actions. Only then can we begin to heal the wounds inflicted upon my children by her personal alliances over the pursuit of truth and justice.

Laws Potentially Broken by Ms. Musielak

Based on an alarming pattern of deeply troubling conduct and potential malfeasance, there exist compelling
grounds to suspect that Ms. Musielak has potentially engaged in actions that may meet the threshold of
criminality under the statutes of our state of Illinois. Moreover, her conduct presents a grave departure from the
ethical responsibilities and professional duties expected of her. The allegations against Ms. Musielak, if substantiated, point to egregious practices that may well have breached established laws within the state of Illinois. These actions include potential instances of perjury, collusion, obstruction of justice, violation of child protection acts, and, remarkably, potential violations of the International Parental Kidnapping Act. These allegations underscore the urgent need for a thorough and exhaustive inquiry

into the conduct in question.

Perjury

Ms. Musielak made several statements under oath that upon verification, were found to be false. This is a violation of 720 ILCS 5/32 – 2 of the Illinois Perjury Law, which strongly condemns the act of providing false testimonies under oath.

Collusion and B reach of Duty of Loyalty

Collusion with the opposing parties make claims of potential breach of her fiduciary duties. As per Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7, she is supposed to avoid any conflict of interest and owe a duty of loyalty to h er clients and not engage in actions that can be detrimental to them.

Obstruction of Justice and Witness Tampering

Evidence supplied suggests Ms. Musielak attempted to manipulate testimonies or impair the administration of justice violating 720 ILCS 5/31 – 4 under Illinois Law and 18 U.S.C. § 1512 in federal law, which deems the act of obstructing justice and altering or influencing a witness as a severe offense.

Violation under CAPTA and Child Endangerment Laws

Her disregard of child abuse and neglect wa rnings constitutes a violation of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), as well as the Illinois Child Endangerment law under 720 ILCS 5/12C – 5, which explicitly requires all cases of child abuse or neglect to be reported, failing which sever e penalties can be enforced.
The allegations against Ms. Musielak are not only grave but also possess an alarming weight that demands immediate attention. If proven true, these accusations would indicate a brazen defiance of the very laws and ethical principles that govern professional conduct. This unprecedented level of misconduct necessitates a meticulous and exhaustive investigation into the matter at hand.
We must recognize the significance of these allegations and the potentially severe consequences they entail. It is of utmost importance that these claims receive the utmost scrutiny to ensure that justice prevails and the well- being of my children is safeguarded. It is my fervent plea that the appropriate authorities undertake a thorough examination of these allegations, leaving no stone unturned in their quest for truth and accountability.

Egregious Misrepresentation by Ms. Musielak to the DCFS Investigator

On December 13, 2023, Ms. Wendy Musielak’s actions reached an alarming peak, demonstrating a blatant disregard for the truth and a disturbing willingness to mislead authorities. Her egregious misrepresentations to the DCFS investigator aimed to derail an ongoing investigation and manipulate the narrative to favor Thomas Neal. These actions not only undermine the integrity of the legal process but also endanger the well-being of my three children. Ms. Musielak’s deliberate distortions and fabrications were orchestrated to derail the truth, shield Thomas Neal, and ultimately endanger the well-being of three innocent children. Ms. Musielak delivered a
series of misleading statements, ostensibly to derail the ongoing investigation. Her assertions, crafted to paint an inaccurately benign picture of the situation, included the following claims:

Misrepresentations by Ms. Musielak Exposed

Ms. Musielak falsely claimed that multiple sources, including the school social worker, Principal Mrs. Marshall, a neighbor, the children’s previous therapist, Dawn Boettger, and the children themselves, all alleged not reporting any concerns regarding Thomas Neal. Despite her claims, documented records indicate numerous reports of child abuse were made to her and to the court. Furt hermore, the therapist, Dawn Boettger, whom Ms. Musielak claimed had no concerns, in fact had a significant criminal record and had been dishonestly reporting and colluding with Ms. Musielak, leading to her removal from the case. This blatant misrepresenta tion, aimed at concealing the children’s abuse allegations, was clearly intended to obstruct the DCFS investigator from further investigating the abuse allegations.

Highlighting Discrepancies in Children's Testimonies

Ms. Musielak’s account to the DCFS in vestigator suggested that the children had denied the previously alleged abuse, conflicting with documented testimonies and concerns outlined in prior reports. Despite claiming multiple meetings where the children supposedly refuted the abuse claims, subpo enaed records reveal a stark contrast. Detailed records show that during these meetings, the children disclosed numerous instances of abuse. Notably, one such meeting occurred just days before the children were extensively interviewed by criminal investigatetors at Thomas Neal’s residence for over two hours. Clearly to attempt to manipulate and influence the children’s responses. Ms. Musielak’s interactions with the children were aimed at influencing their accounts and suppressing their allegations, rendering her statements to the DCFS investigators misleading and dishonest.

Distorted Representation of Mental Health Assessments by Ms. Musielak

In her conversation with the DCFS investigator, Ms. Musielak provided a biased and inaccurate account of the circumstances surrounding my mental health evaluations. She deceitfully alleged that the court mandated me to undergo a mental evaluation due to genuine concerns about my mental well-being. However, the truth unravels a different story.Ms. Musielak, along with Mr. Roberts, sought to manipulate the situation by orchestrating an evaluation performed by the dishonest psychiatrist, Dr. Roger Hatcher. Their intention was to secure a false diagnosis that would serve as grounds to terminate my parental rights and gain control over all child abuse investigations. Despite the serious allegations surrounding Dr. Hatcher, appointed as the mental health evaluator by Judge Aranda at Ms. Musielak’s and attorneys Rick and Chuck Roberts’ request, she misrepresents my compliance. She falsely accuses me of refusing to see Dr. Hatcher, disregarding the fact that I had actively filed multiple motions requesting his removal from the case after clear evidence emerged, exposing his collusion with Ms.Musielak and the opposing counsel.

Misleading Claims Regarding Parental Meetings and Children's Well-Being

Ms. Musielak’s statements about scheduling meetings with the children were not only misleading but also inaccurate. She wrongfully accused me of neglecting to arrange the se meetings, implying non – cooperation on my part. Contrary to her claims, I had actively cooperated with her and requested numerous times for her to meet with the children to investigate serious allegations of child abuse. Regrettably, my requests were lef t unanswered, and the allegations were never properly addressed by Ms. Musielak. This deliberate negligence aimed to paint a distorted picture portraying me as the concerning parent in the eyes of the investigator, deflecting attention away from Thomas Nea l despite the children expressing genuine concerns and fears in his presence.
Ms. Wendy Musielak’s egregious and manipulative acts towards the DCFS investigator dealt a devastating blow to the ongoing investigation of child abuse allegations. Her deliberate attempt to mislead and misrepresent the facts was not only a flagrant breach of the integrity of the legal process but also a grave disservice to the well- being and safety Of my children. By shielding Thomas Neal from accountability and blocking the revelation Of the truth, Ms. Musielak’s actions continued to subject the children to vulnerability and further harm. It is therefore essential to expose and address her misdeeds, rectify the injustices inflicted, and finally secure a future of safety and protection for my children.

Urgent Call for Accountability

Exposing Wendy Musielak's Failures as Guardian ad Litem

The events outlined in this timeline are a shocking expose of the systemic negligence, bias, and collusion within the legal system designed to protect vulnerable children. Despite my strenuous efforts to stop documented abuse and seek justice through due process, I have continually been met with obstruction, unethical behavior, and a profound failure of duty by Ms. Wendy Musielak, the guardian ad litem, and others involved in this case. These incidents exemplify a colossal failure to fulfill the responsibilities entrusted to them and protect the innocent lives at the core of this case.

October 19, 2022

I was granted an or der of protection against Mr. Thomas Neal due to his documented history of child and domestic abuse. Despite being provided with a copy of this order and being fully informed of the numerous allegations of abuse, Ms. Wendy Musielak, as the guardian ad lite m, willfully ignored these serious concerns.

December 6 th , 2022

Met with Ms. Musielak for the first time. During the meeting I shared many instances of when my children were abuse by Thomas Neal and his family. In addition, I pleaded to help my children get them mental health because Thomas Neal had blocked all mental health providers to my children.

January 23, 2023

Christina Magaöa, All Saints Catholic Academy social worker, informed Ms. Musielak of severe abuse allegations involving Thomas Neal. The children displayed acute fear and trauma, yet Ms. Musielak’s inaction has only exacerbated their distress.

March 6th, 2023

I reported serious concerns to Ms. Musielak about neglect and physical harm inflicted by Thomas Neal during a weekend trip. Despite the severity of these allegations, Ms. Musielak refused to respond to my concerns. She ignored calls and emails from both me and my attorney, failing to investigate these critical issues.

March 10, 2023

I received a call from Ms. Dawn Boettger, who warned me against stirring any potential trouble with Ms. Musielak or the other parties involved, emphasizing their significant influence over my life and my children. During the call, she inquired about my expectations regarding the divorce, particularly concerning the custody of my children. Ms. Boettger implied that achieving my desired outcomes would require considerable effort on my part, underscoring the formidable opposition I faced.

March 16, 2023

This was Thomas Neal’s scheduled day with the children. However, subpoena records from United Airlines revealed that Thomas Neal was out of state on this day. According to court orders, when one parent is unavailable to care for the children, the other parent has the right of first refusal. Therefore, as per the court orders, it should have been my day with the children, since Thomas Neal was out of state and unable to fulfill his parental duties.

March 16, 2023

I received a call from a DCFS investigator instructing me to bring the children in for questioning regarding allegations of abuse reported by Edwards Hospital. This call came on a day when, per court orders, the children were supposed to be with me due to Thomas Neal being out of state.

March 16, 2023

Mrs. Magana called Ms. Musielak to inform her that I had picked up the children from school to take them to see a DCFS investigator. Subpoena records reveal that Mrs. Magana told Ms. Musielak, “Heads up, speaking with DCFS,” and added, “Called police.” However, after I demanded answers from Mrs. Marshall, she claimed that she called the police to bring the children back and insisted that no call was made to Ms. Musielak. This discrepancy raises serious questions about the transparency and coordination between school officials and Ms. Musielak, further complicating the integrity of the ongoing investigation.

March 16, 2023

The Naperville Police arrived at the DCFS office shortly after the investigator began questioning the children regarding the allegations of abuse. The interview was abruptly cut short, and the children were handed over to Thomas Neal’s parents, despite the ongoing investigation and my rightful custody for that day as per court orders.

November 2023

My son reported being physically assaulted by Thomas Neal, a serious incident corroborated by his two sisters. I immediately reported this incident to Ms. Musielak, expecting prompt action to protect my children. However, her response and subsequent handling of this critical information were gravely inadequate.

October 12, 2023

My attorney, Bill Cherny, withdrew as my legal representative after he was forwarded an email to Mr. Trevor Prindle of the state prosecutor’s office, which included allegations of his collusion with Ms. Musiclak and attorneys Rick and Chuck Roberts. Despite Mr. Prindle’s duty to investigate child abuse, he never responded to my numerous emails requesting support to investigate my claims, even though I provided evidence of the allegations. This withdrawal, coupled with the lack of support from law enforcement, further complicated my ability to seek justice and defend my rights, underscoring the pervasive collusion and unethical behavior obstructing my case.

December 7, 2023

I filed a motion to remove Ms. Wendy Musielak as the guardian ad litem. This was the second motion I had filed to have her removed. However, Judge Louis Aranda consistently found ways to invalidate my motions and prevent a hearing. The motion contained strong evidence of Ms. Musielakt’s unethical and potentially illegal behavior, making it a legitimate and justifiable request. Despite the compelling evidence presented, the judicial system’s reluctance to address these serious concerns further highlights the obstacles I faced in seeking justice for my children.

December 8, 2023

Mr. Roberts filed a motion to seal my motion to remove Ms. Musielak. I received notice of this motion at 12:28 PM, with an emergency hearing scheduled for just an hour later at I PM. Upon my arrival at the courthouse, I discovered that Judge Louis Aranda’s courtroom was closed. After inquiring, I was informed that no hearing was scheduled for my case that day. The locked courtroom doors during regular court hours were highly unusual. It was evident that they intended to proceed with the hearing without my presence, not anticipating that I would arrive.

December 10, 2023

An advocate for children’s rights at the DuPage courthouse reported the allegations of abuse to DCFS after discovering that Ms. Musielak had not responded to the serious incident reported in November. This advocate’s actions highlight the alarming negligence and lack of responsiveness from Ms. Musielak, further endangering the welfare of my children and raising significant concerns about her fitness to serve as guardian ad litem.

December 12, 2023

Chuck Roberts, Mr. Thomas Neal’s attorney, called Ms. Musielak to inform her about the third DCFS investigation regarding the physical assault reported by my son. This notification underscores the ongoing concerns about Thomas Neal’s behavior and the necessity for a diligent and unbiased response from Ms. Musiclak has thus far failed to adequately address these serious allegations.

December 13, 2023

Ms. Musiclak contacted the DCFS investigator, falsely asserting that there were no concerns from multiple parties. She misleadingly implied that I was not credible due to severe mental health issues allegedly confirmed by Dr. Roger Hatcher. Additionally, she claimed that Dr. Hatcher had evaluated Thomas Neal’s mental health and found no concerns. Ms. Musielak then requested that the DCFS investigator close the case as unfounded, actively misleading the investigation and obstructing efforts to protect my children from further harm.

December 21, 2023

With the investigation still ongoing, Ms. Musielak grew concerned that I would be contacted and disprove her false allegations. This led her to collaborate with Dr. Hatcher, and attorneys Chuck and Rick Roberts, to file an emergency motion to terminate my parental rights at 5:00 PM to be heard the next morning. In the motion, they alleged that I was a danger to my children due to severe mental health problems and that the children needed to be removed from my care, granting Thomas Neal full custody. The motion also barred me from contacting All Saints Catholic Academy and allowed the children to continue seeing Mrs. Magana, despite my request that she no longer interact with my children after I discovered her illegal and unethical actions to conceal child abuse allegations from them. This calculated effort was designed to silence me and strip me of my parental rights to have control of the investigation based on fabricated and misleading claims.

December 22, 2023

I logged into the courthouse Zoom call, but I was refused entry. Desperately, I emailed Ms. Musielak, Mr. Roberts, and the courthouse clerk, pleading to be let in. After waiting for 30 minutes, the clerk responded that due to a court rule, I could not be admitted. The hearing continued without my presence to defend myself. According t o court records, Ms. Musielak took the stand and, under oath, stated that she agreed with everything in the motion filed, requesting that my parental rights be terminated
Despite the motion containing a fabricated affidavit from Dr. Hatcher, which falsely claimed that I was a danger to my children due to mental health problems, and included emails that were never shared with them but somehow were in their possession, the court proceeded. Ms. Musielak failed to report the ongoing DCFS investigation and falsely stated that she had no concerns about Thomas Neal being given full parental rights.
Judge Louis Aranda terminated my parental rights based on statements from Ms. Musielak, Dr. Hatcher, and Mr. Thomas Neal, without any evidence proving that the children were in danger under my care. He ignored the state law that sets a very high bar for terminating parental rights, making his ruling based solely on unsubstantiated claims. This unjust decision, made without my ability to present a defense, further exemplifies the gross misconduct and collusion against me in this case.

The timeline presented here is a stark reminder of the grave miscarriage of justice perpetrated by those charged with protecting the welfare of my children. Ms. Wendy Musielak’s callous disregard for credible allegations of abuse, combined with blatant collusion with other parties, has allowed my children to be continually traumatized and endangered. Her deceitful actions to strip me of my parental rights were an appalling abuse of power and a betrayal of her obligations to fairness and justice.

The pursuit of truth, accountability, and genuine concern for the well-being of my children remains my unwavering commitment. I will not rest until those responsible for this unconscionable conduct face the full extent of the law. Together with the support of advocacy groups and the wider community, we will continue to fight for justice and secure a future where the rights and safety of children are upheld above all else.